<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445804947</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145153.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00453-009-9321-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00453-009-9321-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Competitive Algorithms for Due Date Scheduling</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Nikhil Bansal, Ho-Leung Chan, Kirk Pruhs]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">We consider several online scheduling problems that arise when customers request make-to-order products from a company. At the time of the order, the company must quote a due date to the customer. To satisfy the customer, the company must produce the good by the due date. The company must have an online algorithm with two components: The first component sets the due dates, and the second component schedules the resulting jobs with the goal of meeting the due dates. The most basic quality of service measure for a job is the quoted lead time, which is the difference between the due date and the release time. We first consider the basic problem of minimizing the average quoted lead time. We show that there is a (1+ε)-speed $O(\frac{\log k}{\epsilon})$ -competitive algorithm for this problem (here k is the ratio of the maximum work of a job to the minimum work of a job), and that this algorithm is essentially optimally competitive. This result extends to the case that each job has a weight and the objective is weighted quoted lead time. We then introduce the following general setting: there is a non-increasing profit function p i(t) associated with each job J i. If the customer for job J i is quoted a due date of d i, then the profit obtained from completing this job by its due date is p i(d i). We consider the objective of maximizing profits. We show that if the company must finish each job by its due date, then there is no O(1)-speed poly-log-competitive algorithm. However, if the company can miss the due date of a job, at the cost of forgoing the profits from that job, then we show that there is a (1+ε)-speed O(1+1/ε)-competitive algorithm, and that this algorithm is essentially optimally competitive.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Online algorithms</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Scheduling</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Competitive analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Due dates</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Supply chain</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bansal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nikhil</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IBM T.J. Watson Research, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Chan</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ho-Leung</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pruhs</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kirk</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Computer Science Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Algorithmica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">59/4(2011-04-01), 569-582</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0178-4617</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">59:4&lt;569</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">59</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">453</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-009-9321-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-009-9321-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bansal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nikhil</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">IBM T.J. Watson Research, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Chan</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Ho-Leung</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Pruhs</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kirk</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Computer Science Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Algorithmica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">59/4(2011-04-01), 569-582</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0178-4617</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">59:4&lt;569</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">59</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">453</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
