<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">44580582X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145156.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20111201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10611-011-9335-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10611-011-9335-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Is there such thing as ‘global sex trafficking'? A patchwork tale on useful (mis)understandings</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Yvon van der Pijl, Brenda Oude Breuil, Dina Siegel]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This article intends to respond to a recent call (e.g., Zhang Global Crime 10(3):178-195, 2009; Brunovskis and Surtees International Migration 48(4):1-38, 2010) for more innovative studies and methodologies in order to move beyond the current discourse on human trafficking. We do so by describing three ethnographic fragments on the dynamics of (dealing with) sex trafficking within Europe. The concepts of ‘friction' and ‘collaboration' (Tsing Cultural Anthropology 15(3):327-360, 2000, 2005) are used to analyse these fragments. These concepts refer to creative processes that occur as people interact across differences. They give insight into how universal ideas on freedom and justice enable collaboration between parties involved in fighting human trafficking who do not necessarily share a common goal. We conclude that the presented method of ‘patchwork ethnography' is useful in studying sex trafficking as it implies a strong focus on connections between ‘sites of diverse knowledge', without losing sight of individual stories of people making those connections. ‘Patchwork ethnography' is innovative and it allows researchers to expose and untangle the workings of the supposedly all-powerful phenomenon and the encompassing, uniform, hegemonic discourse surrounding human (sex) trafficking.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">van der Pijl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yvon</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Cultural Anthropology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Oude Breuil</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Brenda</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology, Department of Criminology, Utrecht University, Boothstraat 6, Utrecht, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Siegel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Dina</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology, Department of Criminology, Utrecht University, Boothstraat 6, Utrecht, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Crime, Law and Social Change</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">56/5(2011-12-01), 567-582</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0925-4994</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">56:5&lt;567</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">56</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10611</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9335-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9335-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">van der Pijl</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yvon</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Cultural Anthropology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Oude Breuil</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Brenda</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology, Department of Criminology, Utrecht University, Boothstraat 6, Utrecht, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Siegel</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Dina</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology, Department of Criminology, Utrecht University, Boothstraat 6, Utrecht, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Crime, Law and Social Change</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">56/5(2011-12-01), 567-582</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0925-4994</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">56:5&lt;567</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">56</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10611</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
