<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445822643</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145248.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10626-010-0094-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10626-010-0094-3</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A mean field approach for optimization in discrete time</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Nicolas Gast, Bruno Gaujal]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This paper investigates the limit behavior of Markov decision processes made of independent objects evolving in a common environment, when the number of objects (N) goes to infinity. In the finite horizon case, we show that when the number of objects becomes large, the optimal cost of the system converges to the optimal cost of a discrete time system that is deterministic. Convergence also holds for optimal policies. We further provide bounds on the speed of convergence by proving second order results that resemble central limits theorems for the cost and the state of the Markov decision process, with explicit formulas for the limit. These bounds (of order $1/\sqrt{N}$) are proven to be tight in a numerical example. One can even go further and get convergence of order $\sqrt{\log N}/N$ to a stochastic system made of the mean field limit and a Gaussian term. Our framework is applied to a brokering problem in grid computing. Several simulations with growing numbers of processors are reported. They compare the performance of the optimal policy of the limit system used in the finite case with classical policies by measuring its asymptotic gain. Several extensions are also discussed. In particular, for infinite horizon cases with discounted costs, we show that first order limits hold and that second order results also hold as long as the discount factor is small enough. As for infinite horizon cases with non-discounted costs, examples show that even the first order limits may not hold.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Mean field</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Markov decision process</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Brokering</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gast</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nicolas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Grenoble Université, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gaujal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Bruno</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">LIG, 51 av Jean Kuntzman, 38330, Montbonnot, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Discrete Event Dynamic Systems</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">21/1(2011-03-01), 63-101</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0924-6703</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">21:1&lt;63</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">21</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10626</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10626-010-0094-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10626-010-0094-3</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gast</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Nicolas</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Grenoble Université, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gaujal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Bruno</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">LIG, 51 av Jean Kuntzman, 38330, Montbonnot, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Discrete Event Dynamic Systems</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">21/1(2011-03-01), 63-101</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0924-6703</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">21:1&lt;63</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">21</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10626</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
