<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445837764</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145335.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110501xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00271-010-0229-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00271-010-0229-1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Differences in water-use efficiency among perennial forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[J. Neal, W. Fulkerson, B. Sutton]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The cost and scarcity of water is placing increasing pressure on Australian dairy farmers to utilise water for forage production as efficiently as possible. This study aimed to identify perennial forage species with greater water-use efficiency (WUE) than the current dominant species, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Fifteen perennial forage species were investigated under optimum irrigation and two deficit irrigation treatments, over three years at Camden, NSW, on a brown Dermsol in a warm temperate climate. Under optimal irrigation, there was a nearly twofold difference in mean WUEt (total yield/evapotranspiration) between forages, with kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum Hochst. ex. chiov.) having the highest (27.3kgha−1mm−1) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) the lowest (14.8kgha−1mm−1). Kikuyu was also the most water use efficient forage under the extreme deficit irrigation treatment, although its mean WUEt declined by 15% to 23.2kgha−1mm−1, while white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in the same treatment had the largest decline of 44% and the lowest WUEt of only 8.8kgha−1mm−1. In order to maximise WUE for any forage, it is necessary to maximise yield, as there is a strong positive relationship between yield and WUEt.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Neal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Industry and Investment NSW, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Rd, 2570, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fulkerson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, MC Franklin Lab, 2570, Camden, New South Wales, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sutton</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, Food and Natural Resources, 2006, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Irrigation Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/3(2011-05-01), 213-232</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0342-7188</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:3&lt;213</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">271</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0229-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0229-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Neal</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Industry and Investment NSW, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Rd, 2570, Menangle, New South Wales, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fulkerson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, MC Franklin Lab, 2570, Camden, New South Wales, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sutton</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, Food and Natural Resources, 2006, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Irrigation Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/3(2011-05-01), 213-232</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0342-7188</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:3&lt;213</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">271</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
