caa a22 4500 445838124 CHVBK 20180317145336.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170323e20110201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11023-010-9213-z doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11023-010-9213-z Rapaport William Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 14260-2000, Buffalo, NY, USA aut Yes, She Was! [Elektronische Daten] Reply to Ford's "Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room” [William Rapaport] Ford's "Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room” claims that my argument in "How Helen Keller Used Syntactic Semantics to Escape from a Chinese Room” fails because Searle and I use the terms ‘syntax' and ‘semantics' differently, hence are at cross purposes. Ford has misunderstood me; this reply clarifies my theory. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2010 Chinese room argument nationallicence Syntactic semantics nationallicence Searle nationallicence Minds and Machines Springer Netherlands 21/1(2011-02-01), 3-17 0924-6495 21:1<3 2011 21 11023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9213-z text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9213-z text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Rapaport William Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 14260-2000, Buffalo, NY, USA aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Minds and Machines Springer Netherlands 21/1(2011-02-01), 3-17 0924-6495 21:1<3 2011 21 11023 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer