<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445838655</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145337.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10951-009-0146-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10951-009-0146-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Fast approximation algorithms to minimize a special weighted flow-time criterion on a single machine with a non-availability interval and release dates</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Imed Kacem, Hans Kellerer]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This paper is the first attempt to successfully design efficient approximation algorithms for the single-machine weighted flow-time minimization problem when jobs have different release dates and weights equal to their processing times under the assumption that one job is fixed (i.e., the machine is unavailable during a fixed interval corresponding to the fixed job). Our work is motivated by an interesting algorithmic application to the generation of valid inequalities in a branch-and-cut method. Our analysis shows that the trivial FIFO sequence can lead to an arbitrary large worst-case performance bound. Hence, we modify this sequence so that a new 2-approximation solution can be obtained for every instance and we prove the tightness of this bound. Then, we propose a fully polynomial-time approximation algorithm with efficient running time for the considered problem. Especially, the complexity of our algorithm is strongly polynomial.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Non-availability constraint</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Single-machine</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Flow-time</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Approximation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kacem</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Imed</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Université Paul Verlaine-Metz, LITA, UFR M.I.M, Ile du Saulcy, 57000, Metz, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kellerer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hans</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Statistik und Operations Research, Universität Graz, 8010, Graz, Austria</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Scheduling</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">14/3(2011-06-01), 257-265</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1094-6136</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">14:3&lt;257</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">14</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10951</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0146-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-009-0146-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kacem</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Imed</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Université Paul Verlaine-Metz, LITA, UFR M.I.M, Ile du Saulcy, 57000, Metz, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kellerer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hans</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Statistik und Operations Research, Universität Graz, 8010, Graz, Austria</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Scheduling</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">14/3(2011-06-01), 257-265</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1094-6136</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">14:3&lt;257</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">14</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10951</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
