<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445847352</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145403.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20111001xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10518-011-9258-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10518-011-9258-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Intensity measures for response prediction of a torsional building subjected to bi-directional earthquake ground motion</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Andrea Lucchini, Fabrizio Mollaioli, Giorgio Monti]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In the framework of performance-based assessment of existing RC buildings, an important step is the definition of an intensity measure (IM) of the seismic action that be accurate and efficient in correlating with the engineering demand parameters (EDP) of interest and in reducing the variability in their prediction. Objective of this work is to assess five different IMs, when they are applied to an in-plan irregular three-dimensional building subjected to bi-directional earthquake motion. The objective is pursued through multiple regression of the results obtained from nonlinear dynamic analyses. The study shows that certain IMs are more suitable to evaluate EDPs when dealing with 3D structures subjected to 2D earthquakes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Intensity measures</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Seismic response predictors</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Torsional building</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Bi-directional earthquake</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lucchini</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andrea</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Gramsci 53, 00197, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Mollaioli</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Fabrizio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Gramsci 53, 00197, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Monti</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Giorgio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Gramsci 53, 00197, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/5(2011-10-01), 1499-1518</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1570-761X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:5&lt;1499</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10518</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9258-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9258-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lucchini</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Andrea</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Gramsci 53, 00197, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Mollaioli</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Fabrizio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Gramsci 53, 00197, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Monti</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Giorgio</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Gramsci 53, 00197, Rome, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/5(2011-10-01), 1499-1518</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1570-761X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:5&lt;1499</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10518</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
