caa a22 4500 44584745X CHVBK 20180317145403.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170323e20110401xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1 Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions [Elektronische Daten] [Mehmed Causevic, Sasa Mitrovic] Several procedures for non-linear static and dynamic analysis of structures have been developed in recent years. This paper discusses those procedures that have been implemented into the latest European and US seismic provisions: non-linear dynamic time-history analysis; N2 non-linear static method (Eurocode 8); non-linear static procedure NSP (FEMA 356) and improved capacity spectrum method CSM (FEMA 440). The presented methods differ in respect to accuracy, simplicity, transparency and clarity of theoretical background. Non-linear static procedures were developed with the aim of overcoming the insufficiency and limitations of linear methods, whilst at the same time maintaining a relatively simple application. All procedures incorporate performance-based concepts paying more attention to damage control. Application of the presented procedures is illustrated by means of an example of an eight-storey reinforced concrete frame building. The results obtained by non-linear dynamic time-history analysis and non-linear static procedures are compared. It is concluded that these non-linear static procedures are sustainable for application. Additionally, this paper discusses a recommendation in the Eurocode 8/1 that the capacity curve should be determined by pushover analysis for values of the control displacement ranging between zero and 150% of the target displacement. Maximum top displacement of the analyzed structure obtained by using dynamic method with real time-history records corresponds to 145% of the target displacement obtained using the non-linear static N2 procedure. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2010 Non-linear dynamic analysis nationallicence Non-linear static methods nationallicence Pushover analysis nationallicence N2, NSP and CSM methods nationallicence Causevic Mehmed Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Rijeka, V. C. Emina 5, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia aut Mitrovic Sasa Stabilnost, Rijeka, M. Albaharija 10a, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia aut Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Springer Netherlands 9/2(2011-04-01), 467-489 1570-761X 9:2<467 2011 9 10518 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Causevic Mehmed Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Rijeka, V. C. Emina 5, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Mitrovic Sasa Stabilnost, Rijeka, M. Albaharija 10a, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Springer Netherlands 9/2(2011-04-01), 467-489 1570-761X 9:2<467 2011 9 10518 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer