caa a22 4500 44585930X CHVBK 20180317145438.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170323e20110601xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10290-011-0088-8 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10290-011-0088-8 Has China de-industrialised other developing countries? [Elektronische Daten] [Adrian Wood, Jörg Mayer] China's opening to trade is interpreted as a shift in world average factor endowments, which altered the comparative advantage of other countries. In the rest of the world on average, this shift lowered the share of labour-intensive manufacturing in the sum of labour-intensive manufacturing and primary output by 1-3.5 percentage points, and the corresponding export share by 1.5-5 points. The de-industrialising effect varied among countries, and was clearest in East Asia. It was significant, but not big enough to be a serious threat to growth or equity in most other developing countries. Kiel Institute, 2011 Development nationallicence Heckscher-Ohlin theory nationallicence China nationallicence De-industrialisation nationallicence Wood Adrian University of Oxford, Oxford, UK aut Mayer Jörg United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Palais des Nations, Geneva aut Review of World Economics Springer-Verlag 147/2(2011-06-01), 325-350 1610-2878 147:2<325 2011 147 10290 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-011-0088-8 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-011-0088-8 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Wood Adrian University of Oxford, Oxford, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Mayer Jörg United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Palais des Nations, Geneva aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Review of World Economics Springer-Verlag 147/2(2011-06-01), 325-350 1610-2878 147:2<325 2011 147 10290 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer