<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">445872500</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145516.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1140/epja/i2011-11043-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1140/epja/i2011-11043-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">New results on P -odd asymmetry of $ \gamma$ -quanta emission in 10B(n,$ \alpha$)7Li* $ \rightarrow$ $ \gamma$ + 7Li(g.s.) nuclear reaction</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[V. Vesna, Yu. Gledenov, V. Nesvizhevsky, P. Sedyshev, E. Shulgina]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Abstract.: A series of ultra-sensitive experiments has been carried out in 2001-2009 at the ILL measuring P -odd asymmetry in $ \gamma$ -quanta emission in the nuclear reaction 10B (n,$ \alpha$) 7Li* $ \rightarrow$ $ \gamma$ + $7Li$(g.s.) with polarized cold neutrons. The resulting value of the asymmetry coefficient is $\ensuremath \alpha_{P\mbox{-}{\rm odd}}= +(0.0 \pm 2.6_{{\rm stat}} \pm 1.1_{{\rm syst}}) \times 10^{-8}$ . These experiments profited from high-intensity PF1B neutron facility and a new version of the integral measuring method: for decreasing experimental uncertainties, the frequency of neutron spin-flip was higher than a typical reactor power noise frequency. Using the new value, we constrain the weak neutral current constant in the cluster model framework to $\ensuremath f_{\pi}^{^{10}\rm B} \leq 0.6 \times 10^{-7}$ (at 90% c.l.). This constraint agrees with that following from the nuclear reaction 6Li (n,$ \alpha$) 3H : $\ensuremath f_{\pi}^{^{6}\rm Li} \leq 1.1 \times 10^{-7}$ (at 90% c.l.). However, they both contradict the &quot;best” value in the quark model by Desplanques, Donoughe, and Holstein $\ensuremath f_{\pi}^{{\rm DDH}}=4.6\cdot 10^{-7}$ . We invite experts in the field to contribute to the theoretical analysis of the problem.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Vesna</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute RAS, Gatchina, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gledenov</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yu</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Nesvizhevsky</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sedyshev</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Shulgina</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">E.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute RAS, Gatchina, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">The European Physical Journal A</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">47/3(2011-03-01), 1-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1434-6001</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">47:3&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">47</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10050</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2011-11043-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2011-11043-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Vesna</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute RAS, Gatchina, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gledenov</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yu</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Nesvizhevsky</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sedyshev</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Shulgina</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">E.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute RAS, Gatchina, Russia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">The European Physical Journal A</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">47/3(2011-03-01), 1-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1434-6001</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">47:3&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">47</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10050</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
