<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">44588200X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180317145546.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170323e20110301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10649-010-9276-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10649-010-9276-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Using Delphi methodology to design assessments of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Agida Manizade, Marguerite Mason]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Descriptions of methodologies that can be used to create items for assessing teachers' professionally situated knowledge are lacking in mathematics education research literature. In this study, researchers described and used the Delphi method to design an instrument to measure teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. The instrument focused on a specific area of middle school geometry and measurement, decomposing and recomposing figures in 1-D and 2-D. The Delphi methodology used included three rounds of surveys of a diverse panel of 20 experts. The data analysis and data collection were done reflectively. Initial items were developed based on the research literature in the field of geometry education and teacher knowledge. New categories for the analysis emerged from the data and were used to complete the analysis. Consensus among the experts was reached after the third round of surveys, producing the assessment instrument. The researchers described strengths and limitations of this methodology for designing assessment tools of teachers' knowledge. The researchers suggested that Delphi methodology could also be used to design and validate broader instruments related to other types of professional knowledge of teachers in different fields.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Teachers' knowledge</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Pedagogical content knowledge</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Delphi method</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Assessment of PCK</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Manizade</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Agida</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Radford University, Radford, VA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Mason</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marguerite</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Educational Studies in Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">76/2(2011-03-01), 183-207</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0013-1954</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">76:2&lt;183</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">76</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10649</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9276-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9276-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Manizade</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Agida</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Radford University, Radford, VA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Mason</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marguerite</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Educational Studies in Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">76/2(2011-03-01), 183-207</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0013-1954</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">76:2&lt;183</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2011</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">76</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10649</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
