caa a22 4500 463174038 CHVBK 20180406164821.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170326e20071201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s00355-007-0248-x doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00355-007-0248-x Fleurbaey Marc CERSES, CNRS, University Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270, Paris cedex 6, France aut Social choice and the indexing dilemma [Elektronische Daten] [Marc Fleurbaey] This paper distinguishes an index ordering and a social ordering function as a simple way to formalize the indexing problem in the social choice framework. Two main conclusions are derived. First, the alleged dilemma between welfarism and perfectionism is shown to involve a third possibility, exemplified by the fairness approach to social choice. Second, the idea that an individual is better off than another whenever he has more (goods, functionings, etc.) in all dimensions, which is known to enter in conflict with the Pareto principle, can be partly salvaged by adopting the fairness approach. Springer-Verlag, 2007 Social Choice and Welfare Springer-Verlag 29/4(2007-12-01), 633-648 0176-1714 29:4<633 2007 29 355 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0248-x text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0248-x text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Fleurbaey Marc CERSES, CNRS, University Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270, Paris cedex 6, France aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Social Choice and Welfare Springer-Verlag 29/4(2007-12-01), 633-648 0176-1714 29:4<633 2007 29 355 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer