caa a22 4500 463174054 CHVBK 20180406164821.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170326e20071201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s00355-007-0247-y doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00355-007-0247-y Bradley Richard Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE, London, UK aut Reaching a consensus [Elektronische Daten] [Richard Bradley] This paper explores some aspects of the relation between aggregation and deliberation as ways of achieving a consensus amongst a group of indviduals on some set of issues. I argue firstly that the framing of an aggregation problem itself generates information about the judgements of others that individuals are rationally obliged to take into account. And secondly that the constraints which aggregation theories typically place on consensual or collective judgements need not be consistent with the outcomes of rational deliberative processes driven by individuals' attempts to update on this information. The paper focuses on the particular case of allocation problems, for which there are established results both in aggregation theory and deliberation theory, to make this claim. Springer-Verlag, 2007 Social Choice and Welfare Springer-Verlag 29/4(2007-12-01), 609-632 0176-1714 29:4<609 2007 29 355 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0247-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0247-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Bradley Richard Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, WC2A 2AE, London, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Social Choice and Welfare Springer-Verlag 29/4(2007-12-01), 609-632 0176-1714 29:4<609 2007 29 355 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer