<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">46317562X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406164825.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20071201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10336-007-0166-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10336-007-0166-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The importance of excavators in hole-nesting communities: availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Kathryn Aitken, Kathy Martin]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Nest-holes created by woodpeckers or natural decay processes are an essential commodity for secondary hole-nesting species. Hole-making agents may strongly influence the richness and abundance of species in hole-nester communities. However, few studies have examined the characteristics and relative importance of naturally occurring holes for hole-nesters. Between 1995 and 2006, we examined 1371 excavated and non-excavated holes used by 29 bird and mammal species in central British Columbia, Canada. Excavated holes were much more abundant (85%) than non-excavated holes (15%). Red-naped sapsucker (Sphyrapicus nuchalis) and northern flicker (Colaptes auratus) excavated 52% of the holes monitored. At the community level, non-excavated holes were used for nesting less than expected based on their availability (6% of total nests), particularly among woodpeckers (2% of nests). However, secondary hole-nesters used non-excavated holes roughly in proportion to their availability (10% of nests), and some excavators used non-excavated holes for nesting (flicker and red-breasted nuthatch, Sitta canadensis, 4% of nests each; black-capped chickadee, Poecile atricapillus, 13% of nests). Although nests in non-excavated holes tended to be lower on the tree, larger internally and with larger entrances, only European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) appeared to select non-excavated holes with characteristics most similar to their preferred excavated holes. Non-excavated holes may be an alternate nesting resource for secondary hole-nesters that cannot acquire an excavated hole and, occasionally, for excavators. The use of non-excavated holes may provide an advantage for secondary hole-nesters by releasing them from the constraints of excavator nest-site preferences.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V., 2007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Hole-nesting birds and mammals</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Importance of excavators</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Keystone excavators</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Natural holes</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Secondary hole-nesters</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Aitken</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kathryn</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre for Applied Conservation Research, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, V6T 1Z4, Vancouver, B.C., Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Martin</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kathy</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre for Applied Conservation Research, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, V6T 1Z4, Vancouver, B.C., Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Ornithology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">148(2007-12-01), 425-434</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0021-8375</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">148&lt;425</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">148</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10336</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0166-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">review-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0166-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Aitken</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kathryn</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre for Applied Conservation Research, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, V6T 1Z4, Vancouver, B.C., Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Martin</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kathy</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre for Applied Conservation Research, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, V6T 1Z4, Vancouver, B.C., Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Ornithology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">148(2007-12-01), 425-434</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0021-8375</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">148&lt;425</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">148</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10336</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
