<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463175840</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406164825.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20071201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10336-007-0162-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10336-007-0162-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pepperberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Irene</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Wm James Hall, 33 Kirkland St, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Individual differences in grey parrots ( Psittacus erithacus ): effects of training</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Irene Pepperberg]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) have been shown to exhibit many complex cognitive and communicative abilities in a laboratory setting. The parrots' successes likely rely on two factors: An underlying neurological architecture that supports complex information processing, and training that enables them to express their capacities in ways measurable by human researchers. Individual differences likely can affect both factors, in terms of biology for the former and in response to the quality of the latter, but the quality of the latter can be experimentally controlled. Although training my parrots to communicate in English speech generally enables me to demonstrate their advanced cognitive capacities, occasionally such training has interfered with success on tasks requiring a specific type of complex information processing. For two cohorts of parrots, one with and one without extensive communicative training, I describe here the results for two different tasks. In one task—the ability to segment English speech sounds and demonstrate phonological awareness—communication training, as expected, enhanced success [IM Pepperberg (2007) Lang Sci 29:1-13]. In the other task—retrieval of an item suspended from a long string to demonstrate means-ends understanding—communication training unexpectedly inhibited success [IM Pepperberg (2004) Anim Cogn 7:263-266]. Individual differences can therefore be expressed in ways that are not necessarily predictable and that encourage further experimentation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V., 2007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Grey parrots</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Individual differences</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Insight</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Phonological awareness</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Ornithology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">148(2007-12-01), 161-168</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0021-8375</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">148&lt;161</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">148</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10336</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0162-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">review-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0162-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Pepperberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Irene</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Wm James Hall, 33 Kirkland St, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Ornithology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">148(2007-12-01), 161-168</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0021-8375</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">148&lt;161</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">148</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10336</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
