<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463177797</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406164830.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10596-006-9033-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10596-006-9033-7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">CO2 leakage through an abandoned well: problem-oriented benchmarks</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Anozie Ebigbo, Holger Class, Rainer Helmig]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The efficiency and sustainability of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in deep geological formations crucially depends on the integrity of the overlying cap-rocks. Existing oil and gas wells, which penetrate the formations, are potential leakage pathways. This problem has been discussed in the literature, and a number of investigations using semi-analytical mathematical approaches have been carried out by other authors to quantify leakage rates. The semi-analytical results are based on a number of simplifying assumptions. Thus, it is of great interest to assess the influence of these assumptions. We use a numerical model to compare the results with those of the semi-analytical model. Then we ease the simplifying restrictions and include more complex thermodynamic processes including sub- and supercritical fluid properties of CO2 and non-isothermal as well as compositional effects. The aim is to set up problem-oriented benchmark examples that allow a comparison of different modeling approaches to the problem of CO2 leakage.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">benchmarks</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">CO2 sequestration</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">non-isothermal effects</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">numerical modeling</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">semi-analytical solutions</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ebigbo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anozie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Wasserbau, Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Class</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Holger</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Wasserbau, Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Helmig</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Rainer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Wasserbau, Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Computational Geosciences</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">11/2(2007-06-01), 103-115</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1420-0597</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">11:2&lt;103</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">11</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10596</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-006-9033-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-006-9033-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ebigbo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anozie</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Wasserbau, Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Class</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Holger</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Wasserbau, Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Helmig</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Rainer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Wasserbau, Lehrstuhl für Hydromechanik und Hydrosystemmodellierung, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Computational Geosciences</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">11/2(2007-06-01), 103-115</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1420-0597</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">11:2&lt;103</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">11</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10596</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
