caa a22 4500 463183037 CHVBK 20180406164844.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170326e20070301xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7 The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum [Elektronische Daten] [Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno] Robert Kimball, in "What's Wrong with Argumentum Ad Baculum?” (Argumentation, 2006) argues that dialogue-based models of rational argumentation do not satisfactorily account for what is objectionable about more malicious uses of threats encountered in some ad baculum arguments. We review the dialogue-based approach to argumentum ad baculum, and show how it can offer more than Kimball thinks for analyzing such threat arguments and ad baculum fallacies. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2006 abductive reasoning nationallicence dialectical argumentation nationallicence fallacies nationallicence negotiation nationallicence threats nationallicence virtue ethics nationallicence Walton Douglas Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Avenue, R3B 2E9, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada aut Macagno Fabrizio Department of Linguistics, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy aut Argumentation Springer Netherlands 21/1(2007-03-01), 63-81 0920-427X 21:1<63 2007 21 10503 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9018-7 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Walton Douglas Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Avenue, R3B 2E9, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Macagno Fabrizio Department of Linguistics, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Argumentation Springer Netherlands 21/1(2007-03-01), 63-81 0920-427X 21:1<63 2007 21 10503 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer