caa a22 4500 463183126 CHVBK 20180406164844.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170326e20070901xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10503-007-9051-1 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10503-007-9051-1 Countering Fallacious Moves [Elektronische Daten] [Frans van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser] Van Eemeren and Houtlosser view fallacies as "derailments of strategic maneuvering” that go against a norm for critical reasonableness. What is to happen if such a derailment is perceived to have taken place? Krabbe (2003) and Jacobs (2000) have discussed the possibilities for continuing the argumentative exchange in a constructive way. Starting from their proposals, van Eemeren and Houtlosser argue that the party who observes that something has gone wrong should maneuver in such a way that at the same time the derailment is recognized and a "re-railment” takes place that brings the discussion back on track. This means that then a meta-dialogue or sub-discussion develops in which the alleged fallacy is responded to and readjusted appropriately. Although this solution has something in common with both Krabbe's proposal and Jacobs' proposal, it differs from Krabbe's proposal because it does not result in just retracting or maintaining the alleged fallacy and it differs from Jacobs' proposal because it does not allow for making a move that has the appearance of a counter-fallacy. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2007 counter-fallacies nationallicence fallacies nationallicence meta-dialogue nationallicence (derailment of) strategic maneuvering nationallicence van Eemeren Frans Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands aut Houtlosser Peter Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands aut Argumentation Springer Netherlands 21/3(2007-09-01), 243-252 0920-427X 21:3<243 2007 21 10503 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9051-1 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9051-1 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- van Eemeren Frans Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Houtlosser Peter Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Argumentation Springer Netherlands 21/3(2007-09-01), 243-252 0920-427X 21:3<243 2007 21 10503 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer