caa a22 4500 463183193 CHVBK 20180406164845.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170326e20071201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10503-007-9059-6 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10503-007-9059-6 Manolescu Beth Department of Communication Studies, University of Kansas, Bailey Hall, Room 102, 1440 Jayhawk Blvd., 66045, Lawrence, KS, USA aut Shaming in and into Argumentation [Elektronische Daten] [Beth Manolescu] Shame appeals may be both relevant to and make possible argumentation with reluctant addressees. I propose a normative pragmatic model of practical reasoning involved in shame appeals and show that its explanatory power exceeds that of a more traditional account of an underlying practical inference structure. I also illustrate that analyzing the formal propriety of shame appeals offers a more complete explanation of their normative pragmatic force than an application of rules for dialogue types. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2007 shame appeals nationallicence normative pragmatics nationallicence pragma-dialectics nationallicence ad populum tactics nationallicence tu quoque tactics nationallicence Carrie Chapman Catt nationallicence Argumentation Springer Netherlands 21/4(2007-12-01), 379-395 0920-427X 21:4<379 2007 21 10503 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9059-6 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9059-6 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Manolescu Beth Department of Communication Studies, University of Kansas, Bailey Hall, Room 102, 1440 Jayhawk Blvd., 66045, Lawrence, KS, USA aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Argumentation Springer Netherlands 21/4(2007-12-01), 379-395 0920-427X 21:4<379 2007 21 10503 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer