<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463200292</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405153110.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11061-007-9037-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11061-007-9037-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Candel Bormann</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Daniel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Departamento de Filología Moderna, Colegio San José de Caracciolos, Universidad de Alcalá, C/Trinidad 3, 8801, Alcala de Henares, Spain</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Ein Bild hielt uns gefangen: The Da Vinci Code and the Humanae Vitae</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Daniel Candel Bormann]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This article analyses the understanding of sexuality and women in Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code and compares it with the one offered by the Catholic encyclical Humanae Vitae. It does so against the background of the four dimensions of the real as advocated by Todorov and others. The first part of the article analyses how, and explains why, by grafting women and nature on to the religious—the first via child-birth in chapters 55-58, the second via sex in chapter 74—Brown's text runs the risk of objectifying women, de-naturalising sex, and de-individuating sexual encounters. The second part of the article highlights the similarities and differences between Brown's novel and the Catholic encyclical. Both texts are shown to work in surprisingly similar ways, as they both denature sex, make much of sacrifice and sexual continence, and defend a teleological view of sex. Ultimately, however, differences prevail, as in both texts the understanding and use of teleology on the one hand, and the value conferred to individualisation on the other, differ widely, emphasising the coherence—although a radical one—of the Humanae Vitae and the lack of coherence of The Da Vinci Code.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 2007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Dan Brown</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">The Da Vinci Code</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Literature and theology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Literature and religion</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Humanae Vitae</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Catholicism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Teleology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Feminism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Neophilologus</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">91/3(2007-07-01), 333-350</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0028-2677</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">91:3&lt;333</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">91</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11061</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-007-9037-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-007-9037-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Candel Bormann</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Daniel</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Departamento de Filología Moderna, Colegio San José de Caracciolos, Universidad de Alcalá, C/Trinidad 3, 8801, Alcala de Henares, Spain</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Neophilologus</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">91/3(2007-07-01), 333-350</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0028-2677</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">91:3&lt;333</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">91</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11061</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
