<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463205944</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405153126.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11228-006-0032-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11228-006-0032-6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hess</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre de Recherche Stratégies et Dynamiques Financières, Université Paris Dauphine, Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 75775, Paris, CEDEX 16, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">On the Parametrized Integral of a Multifunction: The Unbounded Case</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Christian Hess]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Integration of set-valued maps (alias multifunctions) depending on a parameter is revisited. Results of Artstein, and of Saint-Pierre and Sajid are extended to the case of set-valued maps whose values may be unbounded. In the general case, this is achieved assuming that the transition probabilities involved in the integration procedure are absolutely continuous with respect to some fixed probability measure. However, when the integrating probability measure does not depend on the parameter this hypothesis is shown to be unnecessary. On the other hand, an alternative proof of a result of Saint-Pierre and Sajid is provided for convex compact-valued multifunctions. An application is given to the control of chattering systems. It is an extension of a result of Artstein to the case of set-valued maps with unbounded values. The proof of the main results is simple and essentially relies on measurable selections arguments.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">set-valued maps</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">integration of multifunctions</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Aumann integral</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">transition probability</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">measurable selections</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">chattering controls</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Radon-Nikodym property</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Set-Valued Analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">15/1(2007-03-01), 1-20</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0927-6947</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">15:1&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">15</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11228</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-006-0032-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11228-006-0032-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hess</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Centre de Recherche Stratégies et Dynamiques Financières, Université Paris Dauphine, Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 75775, Paris, CEDEX 16, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Set-Valued Analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">15/1(2007-03-01), 1-20</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0927-6947</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">15:1&lt;1</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">15</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11228</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
