<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463207068</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405153129.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10462-008-9071-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10462-008-9071-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="3">
   <subfield code="a">An evaluation of one-class classification techniques for speaker verification</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Anthony Brew, Marco Grimaldi, Pádraig Cunningham]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Speaker verification is a challenging problem in speaker recognition where the objective is to determine whether a segment of speech in fact comes from a specific individual. In supervised machine learning terms this is a challenging problem as, while examples belonging to the target class are easy to gather, the set of counter-examples is completely open. This makes it difficult to cast this as a supervised classification problem as it is difficult to construct a representative set of counter examples. So we cast this as a one-class classification problem and evaluate a variety of state-of-the-art one-class classification techniques on a benchmark speech recognition dataset. We construct this as a two-level classification process whereby, at the lower level, speech segments of 20ms in length are classified and then a decision on an complete speech sample is made by aggregating these component classifications. We show that of the one-class classification techniques we evaluate, Gaussian Mixture Models shows the best performance on this task.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">One-class classifiers</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Speaker verification</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Gaussian mixture models</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Brew</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anthony</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Grimaldi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marco</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cunningham</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Pádraig</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Artificial Intelligence Review</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/4(2007-04-01), 295-307</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-2821</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:4&lt;295</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10462</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-008-9071-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-008-9071-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Brew</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anthony</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Grimaldi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marco</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Cunningham</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Pádraig</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Artificial Intelligence Review</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/4(2007-04-01), 295-307</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-2821</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:4&lt;295</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10462</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
