<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463207084</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405153129.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10462-008-9082-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10462-008-9082-5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="3">
   <subfield code="a">An evaluation of dimension reduction techniques for one-class classification</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Santiago Villalba, Pádraig Cunningham]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Dimension reduction (DR) is important in the processing of data in domains such as multimedia or bioinformatics because such data can be of very high dimension. Dimension reduction in a supervised learning context is a well posed problem in that there is a clear objective of discovering a reduced representation of the data where the classes are well separated. By contrast DR in an unsupervised context is ill posed in that the overall objective is less clear. Nevertheless successful unsupervised DR techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) exist—PCA has the pragmatic objective of transforming the data into a reduced number of dimensions that still captures most of the variation in the data. While one-class classification falls somewhere between the supervised and unsupervised learning categories, supervised DR techniques appear not to be applicable at all for one-class classification because of the absence of a second class label in the training data. In this paper we evaluate the use of a number of up-to-date unsupervised DR techniques for one-class classification and we show that techniques based on cluster coherence and locality preservation are effective.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">One class classification</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Dimensionality reduction</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Feature selection</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Feature transformation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Principal component analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Locality preservation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Cluster coherence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Villalba</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Santiago</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Machine Learning Group, School of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cunningham</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Pádraig</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Machine Learning Group, School of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Artificial Intelligence Review</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/4(2007-04-01), 273-294</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-2821</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:4&lt;273</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10462</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-008-9082-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-008-9082-5</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Villalba</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Santiago</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Machine Learning Group, School of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Cunningham</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Pádraig</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Machine Learning Group, School of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Artificial Intelligence Review</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/4(2007-04-01), 273-294</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0269-2821</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:4&lt;273</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10462</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
