<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463210387</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405153138.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00238-006-0092-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00238-006-0092-8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Bacterial growth on adhesive dressing tapes used for the closure of surgical wounds</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[S. Lipscombe, A. Juma]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sterile Steri-Strip tape is now commonly used to support sutured closure of skin edges in the operating theatre. This tape is more expensive than non-sterile 3M Micropore tape, which had been used without any evidence of increased wound infections. This prospective clinical trial compared bacterial growth on the two tapes after their application to the intact skin of 21 healthy volunteers from the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department at a District General Hospital. Using an aseptic technique and following chlorhexidine skin preparation, two Steri-Strip adhesive tapes and two measured lengths of 3M Micropore tape were applied to the intact skin of the volunteer's upper arms, then removed after 7days, and cultured on blood agar plates. The mean numbers of colony forming units grown from Micropore tape was 24.07 ± 4.10 and for Steri-Strips 19.77 ± 3.30. Coagulase negative staphylococci and Micrococcus species were the main organisms isolated from the cultures. The plates were blinded to the microbiologist counting the colony forming units with the tapes removed after incubation. No adverse skin reactions were noted for either tape and only one Micropore tape demonstrated loss of adhesion. On the skin of healthy volunteers, there was no significant difference between the bacterial growth on either tape. A clinical trial should now be completed to confirm the results of this study that non-sterile 3M Micropore tape can safely be used for the closure of surgical wounds.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Adhesive dressing tape</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Bacterial growth</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Wound closure</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lipscombe</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, Cheshire, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Juma</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Countess of Chester Health Park, Liverpool Road, CH2 1UL, Chester, Cheshire, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">European Journal of Plastic Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/5(2007-01-01), 217-220</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0930-343X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:5&lt;217</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">238</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-006-0092-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-006-0092-8</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lipscombe</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, Cheshire, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Juma</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Countess of Chester Health Park, Liverpool Road, CH2 1UL, Chester, Cheshire, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">European Journal of Plastic Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">29/5(2007-01-01), 217-220</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0930-343X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">29:5&lt;217</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">29</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">238</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
