<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463221346</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405153213.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10853-006-1057-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10853-006-1057-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="3">
   <subfield code="a">An experimental study of low velocity impact response in 2/2 twill weave composite laminates manufactured by a novel fabrication process</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[J. Zhang, B. Fox]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A novel fabrication process for advanced composite components—the QuicktepTM process was described. 2/2 twill weave MTM56/CF0300 carbon epoxy composite laminates were manufactured by the Quickstep and the autoclave processes. The response of these laminates to drop-weight low velocity impact at energy levels ranging from 5 to 30J was investigated. It was found that the laminates fabricated by the Quickstep had better impact damage tolerance than those fabricated by the autoclave. Optical microscopy revealed extensive matrix fracture in the center of the backside of the autoclave laminates indicating the more brittle property of the epoxy matrix cured by the autoclave process. Interfacial shear strength (IFSS) for two composite systems were measured by micro-debond experiments. The MTM56/CF0300 material cured by the Quickstep showed stronger fibre matrix adhesion. Since the thickness and density of the impact targets produced by two processes were different, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to study the effect of these factors on the impact response. The simulation results showed that the difference in thickness and density affects the stress distribution under impact loading. Higher thickness and lower density caused by processing lead to less endurance to drop weight impact loading. Therefore the better performance of Quickstep laminates under impact loading was not due to the thickness and density change, but resulted from stronger mechanical properties.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Zhang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Victorian Centre for Advanced Materials Manufacturing School of Engineering and Technology, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd., 3217, Geelong, VIC, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fox</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Victorian Centre for Advanced Materials Manufacturing School of Engineering and Technology, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd., 3217, Geelong, VIC, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Materials Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/1(2007-01-01), 232-238</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-2461</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:1&lt;232</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10853</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1057-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1057-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Zhang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Victorian Centre for Advanced Materials Manufacturing School of Engineering and Technology, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd., 3217, Geelong, VIC, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fox</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Victorian Centre for Advanced Materials Manufacturing School of Engineering and Technology, Deakin University, Pigdons Rd., 3217, Geelong, VIC, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Materials Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/1(2007-01-01), 232-238</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-2461</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:1&lt;232</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10853</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
