<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">463228901</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405153235.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170326e20070901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10853-006-1326-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10853-006-1326-7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Impression creep of monolithic and composite lead free solders</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Purushotham Muthur Srinath, Pranesh Aswath]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Even though several EMS (Electronic manufacturing services) companies are currently producing &quot;lead free” products, a general notion of apprehension still exists in the industry, primarily due to the lack of sufficient mechanical reliability data supporting the use of lead free alloys. The current study was an effort to generate an understanding of the mechanisms of creep deformation in monolithic and composite (Ag and Cu reinforced) Sn-3.5Ag and Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu lead free alloys in the high stress high temperature regime. Small volume solder samples were reflowed using a custom built computer controlled resistance furnace. Impression creep testing was employed to determine the activation energy and stress exponent. A careful analysis of the collected data revealed the underlying creep mechanisms and the following conclusions could be made. Both Sn-3.5Ag and Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu exhibited higher creep resistance as compared to the eutectic tin-lead solder under all tested conditions, with the ternary lead free alloy marginally outperforming the binary lead free alloy. Composite solders performed better as compared to monolithic solders. Furthermore, Cu reinforced solders demonstrated higher creep resistance as compared to Ag reinforced solders.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Muthur Srinath</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Purushotham</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 West First Street, 76019, Arlington, TX, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Aswath</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Pranesh</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 West First Street, 76019, Arlington, TX, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Materials Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/17(2007-09-01), 7592-7600</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-2461</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:17&lt;7592</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10853</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1326-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1326-7</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Muthur Srinath</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Purushotham</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 West First Street, 76019, Arlington, TX, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Aswath</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Pranesh</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 West First Street, 76019, Arlington, TX, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Materials Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">42/17(2007-09-01), 7592-7600</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-2461</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">42:17&lt;7592</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">42</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10853</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
