<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465741878</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111810.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19901101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00041997</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00041997</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Inclusion of primary creep in the estimation of the C t parameter</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Chun-Pok Leung, David McDowell]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The problem of time-dependent fracture under transient creep conditions is investigated via finite element analyses of fracture specimens with stationary cracks. The constitutive models consist of linear elasticity with combinations of power-law secondary creep and two primary creep laws. Two proposed parameters are studied. One is a contour integral, C(t), which characterizes the crack tip singularity strength. The other one, C t, is evaluated based on the load line deflection rate and has been used successfully in correlating experimental creep crack growth data. It is evident that accurate constitutive modeling is essential to good agreement with experimental data. The inclusion of primary creep resolves earlier discrepancies between the experimental and analytical load line deflection rates which are used to calculate the respective values of C t. The loading boundary condition is also an important factor that has been addressed. A more general formulation of C twhich includes primary creep is presented. In small scale and transition creep, the C tparameter does not characterize the crack tip stress singularity but rather is related to the crack tip creep zone growth rate. At times past transition time, C tand C(t) both approach a path-independent integral, C *(t), which characterizes the stationary crack tip stress field. The relationship between C tand C(t) is discussed. The interpretation and estimation of the C tparameter are given based on the numerical results and analytical manipulations.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Leung</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Chun-Pok</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 30332, Atlanta, Georgia, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">McDowell</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 30332, Atlanta, Georgia, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Fracture</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/2(1990-11-01), 81-104</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0376-9429</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:2&lt;81</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10704</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041997</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041997</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Leung</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Chun-Pok</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 30332, Atlanta, Georgia, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">McDowell</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 30332, Atlanta, Georgia, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Fracture</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">46/2(1990-11-01), 81-104</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0376-9429</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">46:2&lt;81</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">46</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10704</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
