<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465750214</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111832.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19900301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01889705</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01889705</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Krzanowski</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 217, RG6 2AN, Reading, U.K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Between-group analysis with heterogeneous covariance matrices: The common principal component model</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[W. Krzanowski]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Analysis of between-group differences using canonical variates assumes equality of population covariance matrices. Sometimes these matrices are sufficiently different for the null hypothesis of equality to be rejected, but there exist some common features which should be exploited in any analysis. The common principal component model is often suitable in such circumstances, and this model is shown to be appropriate in a practical example. Two methods for between-group analysis are proposed when this model replaces the equal dispersion matrix assumption. One method is by extension of the two-stage approach to canonical variate analysis using sequential principal component analyses as described by Campbell and Atchley (1981). The second method is by definition of a distance function between populations satisfying the common principal component model, followed by metric scaling of the resulting between-populations distance matrix. The two methods are compared with each other and with ordinary canonical variate analysis on the previously introduced data set.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag New York Inc, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Between-group analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Canonical variate analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Common principal component model</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Eigenvalues and eigenvectors</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Matusita distance between populations</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metric scaling</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Principal component analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Classification</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">7/1(1990-03-01), 81-98</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0176-4268</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">7:1&lt;81</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">7</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">357</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889705</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889705</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Krzanowski</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">W.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 217, RG6 2AN, Reading, U.K</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Classification</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">7/1(1990-03-01), 81-98</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0176-4268</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">7:1&lt;81</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">7</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">357</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
