<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465750958</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111833.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19901201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02321509</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02321509</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Modal parameters for structural integrity monitoring of fixed offshore platforms</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[V. Idichandy, C. Ganapathy]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The most commonly used offshore oil-production platforms, the jacket structures, because of their long service in a very hostile environment, require periodic inspection for structural integrity. Present-day diver inspection is highly uneconomical and has certain inherent limitations. To overcome these limitations, it has been proposed to use an instrumented monitoring system based on the dynamic response of the platform. Several investigations were carried out to remove the uncertainties in this method which arose mainly from changes in the mass on the deck and marine growth. One of the important proposals investigated was the use of modal vectors. But these investigations were based on simple analytical and physical models. In order to assess the efficiency of using modal vectors to monitor the structural integrity of the platform, a detailed study was carried out on a real platform. Finite-element and physical models of the platform were used in the investigation. This paper reports on the physical model tests. A geometric model of the platform was tested under electrodynamic and wave excitation, simulating damages in the structure and changing the mass on the deck. In all tests, modal frequencies and modal vectors in different degrees of freedom were determined by autospectral analysis of acceleration response. Baed on the results, a scheme for integrity monitoring of a fixed offshore platform is suggested which, if implemented carefully, can at least minimize, if not dispense with, the uneconomic diver inspection.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc., 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Idichandy</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ocean Engineering Center, Indian Institute of Technology, 600 036, Madras, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ganapathy</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ocean Engineering Center, Indian Institute of Technology, 600 036, Madras, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Experimental Mechanics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">30/4(1990-12-01), 382-391</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0014-4851</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">30:4&lt;382</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">30</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11340</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321509</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321509</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Idichandy</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ocean Engineering Center, Indian Institute of Technology, 600 036, Madras, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ganapathy</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ocean Engineering Center, Indian Institute of Technology, 600 036, Madras, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Experimental Mechanics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">30/4(1990-12-01), 382-391</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0014-4851</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">30:4&lt;382</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">30</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11340</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
