<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465750982</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111833.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19901201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02321503</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02321503</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Comparison of residual-stress variation with depth-analysis techniques for the hole-drilling method</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[M. Flaman, J. Boag]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Numerous data-analysis techniques have been developed to determine residual-stress information from strain data obtained from the hole-drilling method. The most commonly used technique for data analysis was developed by Rendler and Vigness (which forms the basis of the standard described in ASTM E837-85). A numerical development which was a model of the hole-drilling procedure has been used to determine stress variation with depth. A rigorous finite-element method to specifically analyze stresses in discrete hole increments has been developed. To evaluate these data-analysis techniques, three different computer-simulated stress fields are compared. The stress fields include a uniaxial stress that is constant with depth, a bending stress that varies linearly with depth, and a subsurface stress reversal. (The basis for this comparison is a finite-element developed technique. Its accuracy will be discussed later.) All data-analysis techniques showed excellent agreement for the uniaxial stress constant with depth test case. However, for the other two stress fields, significant discrepancies were apparent. Results are compared and discussed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc., 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Flaman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Structural-Integrity Measurements Unit, Ontario Hydro Research Division, 800 Kipling Avenue, M8Z 5S4, Toronto, Ontario, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Boag</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Structural-Integrity Measurements Unit, Ontario Hydro Research Division, 800 Kipling Avenue, M8Z 5S4, Toronto, Ontario, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Experimental Mechanics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">30/4(1990-12-01), 352-355</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0014-4851</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">30:4&lt;352</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">30</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11340</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321503</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02321503</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Flaman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Structural-Integrity Measurements Unit, Ontario Hydro Research Division, 800 Kipling Avenue, M8Z 5S4, Toronto, Ontario, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Boag</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Structural-Integrity Measurements Unit, Ontario Hydro Research Division, 800 Kipling Avenue, M8Z 5S4, Toronto, Ontario, Canada</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Experimental Mechanics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">30/4(1990-12-01), 352-355</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0014-4851</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">30:4&lt;352</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">30</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11340</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
