<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465754600</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111843.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19901201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01170005</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01170005</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">King</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, 30602, Athens, Georgia, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Three-dimensional aromaticity: A topological analysis of computational methods</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[R. King]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The deltahedral boranes B n H n 2− (6 ≤n ≤ 12) may be regarded as three-dimensional delocalized aromatic systems in which surface bonding and core bonding correspond to σ-bonding andπ-bonding, respectively, in planar polygonal two-dimensional hydrocarbons C n H n (n − 6)+ (n = 5, 6, 7). The two extreme types of topologies which may be used to model core bonding in deltahedral boranes are the deltahedral (D n) topology based on the 1-skeleton of the underlying deltahedron and the complete (K n) topology based on the corresponding complete graph. Symmetry factoring of generalized graphs representing the core-bonding interactions in the highly symmetrical octahedral borane B6 H6 and icosahedral borane B12H 12 2− leads to methods for separating the effects of core and surface bonding in molecular orbital energy parameters. Such analyses of the Hoffmann—Lipscomb LCAO-MO extended Mickel computations, the Armstrong—Perkins—Stewart self-consistent molecular orbital computations, and SCF MO ab initio Guassian 82 computations on B6H 6 2− and B12H 12 2− indicate that the approximation of atomic orbitals by a sum of Gaussians, as is typical in modem ab initio computations, leads to significantly weaker apparent core bonding approximated more closely by deltahedral (D n) rather than complete (K n) topology. Furthermore, theT 1u core orbitals which, if pure, would be nonbonding in octahedral (D 6) core topology for B6 H 6 2− and bonding in icosahedral (D12) core topology for B12H 12 2− , become antibonding through strong core—surface mixing. Because of this, the simpler graph-theory derived model for deltahedral boranes using complete (K n) core bonding topology gives the correct numbers of bonding orbitals even in cases where the complete graphK n is a poor approximation for the actual core bonding topology.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">J.C. Baltzer AG, Scientific Publishing Company, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Mathematical Chemistry</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">4/1(1990-12-01), 69-85</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0259-9791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">4:1&lt;69</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">4</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10910</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01170005</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01170005</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">King</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, 30602, Athens, Georgia, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Mathematical Chemistry</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">4/1(1990-12-01), 69-85</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0259-9791</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">4:1&lt;69</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">4</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10910</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
