<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465756182</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111847.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19900301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01384965</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01384965</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Howes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">&quot;We are the world” and its counterparts: Popular song as constitutional discourse</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[David Howes]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Conclusion: I have attempted to show what kinds of insights can accrue from taking a constitutional approach to the analysis of popular culture, and a cultural approach to the analysis of the wording and interpretation of constitutions. The result is a more cultured appreciation of the work of constitutional interpretation, and a heightened awareness of how a constitution, which is primarily a mode for the production of legislation, can also be said to inform &quot;production” in other domains as well. One very significant respect in which the present analysis differs from other analyses of popular culture is that rather than analyzing the texts as &quot;unconscious articulations of class conflict and domination,” in Jon Cook's words, I have examined them for their legality. The advantage of this approach is that it does seem to have allowed for a finer reading of the texts than class analysis would permit, because constitutions differ in ways that class structures do not and thus provide a finer grid. In short, constitutions deserve far more consideration than they have received in cultural studies, just as constitutional studies could do with a lot more culture.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Human Sciences Press, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">3/3(1990-03-01), 315-339</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0891-4486</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">3:3&lt;315</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">3</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10767</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384965</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384965</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Howes</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">David</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">3/3(1990-03-01), 315-339</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0891-4486</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">3:3&lt;315</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">3</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10767</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
