<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465756336</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111848.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19900201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00221383</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00221383</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">The dominant regime method</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Edwin Hinloopen, Peter Nijkamp]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In recent years an avalanche of literature has been published in the field of multiple criteria analysis. This methodology for decision-making and evaluation serves to find the best compromise solutions among alternative choice options, taking into account the existence of conflicting judgment criteria. The present paper focuses attention on one particular class of multiple criteria methods, viz. those in which the available information (impacts and policy priorities) is measured in an ordinal sense. This low level of measurement precludes the application of standard numerical methods. For this problem a new method, the so-called regime analysis, is devised in the paper. This method is based on a pairwise comparison of choice options and serves to find the best available compromise by identifying that option which ensures the highest score probability that is embodied in the ordinal information. The formal derivation is based upon the principle of insufficient reasoning and leads in general to an unambiguous choice. Particular attention is also given to the existence of ties and of mixed (i.e. qualitative-quantitative) information. The method is illustrated by means of an evaluation problem regarding 12 types of automobiles on the basis of a variety of judgement criteria.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hinloopen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Edwin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Free University Dept. of Economics, P.O. Box 7161, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Nijkamp</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Free University Dept. of Economics, P.O. Box 7161, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Quality and Quantity</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/1(1990-02-01), 37-56</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0033-5177</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:1&lt;37</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11135</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221383</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221383</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hinloopen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Edwin</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Free University Dept. of Economics, P.O. Box 7161, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Nijkamp</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Free University Dept. of Economics, P.O. Box 7161, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Quality and Quantity</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/1(1990-02-01), 37-56</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0033-5177</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:1&lt;37</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11135</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
