caa a22 4500 465757111 CHVBK 20180323111850.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170327e19900301xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF01110632 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01110632 Tannenbaum Margaret Secondary Education/Educational Foundations, School of Education, Glassboro State College, 08028-1757, Glassboro, NJ aut Vouchers are a viable option for urban settings: A response to Andrew B. Sandler and David E. Kapel [Elektronische Daten] [Margaret Tannenbaum] A system of funding education through vouchers is not only a viable option for urban settings but it would be more likely than any other form of systemic restructuring to reduce inequity between advantaged and disadvantaged students, increase meaningful instances of choice in education, and improve the quality of education. Funding education through vouchers would make good economic sense because private schools presently educate children at roughly half the cost of public schools. In addition, the present form of state-controlled education is a violation of both the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses of the First Amendment. Finally, there has never been a full implementation of a voucher system. Therefore, no hard conclusions regarding the outcome of such implementation can be made. Human Sciences Press, Inc., 1990 The Urban Review Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press 22/1(1990-03-01), 61-73 0042-0972 22:1<61 1990 22 11256 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01110632 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01110632 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Tannenbaum Margaret Secondary Education/Educational Foundations, School of Education, Glassboro State College, 08028-1757, Glassboro, NJ aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- The Urban Review Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press 22/1(1990-03-01), 61-73 0042-0972 22:1<61 1990 22 11256 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer