caa a22 4500 465769926 CHVBK 20180323111926.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170327e19900601xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF01108716 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01108716 Peters Michael Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, NIG 2W1, Guelph, Ontario, Canada aut Neuropsychological identification of motor problems: Can we learn something from the feet and legs that hands and arms will not tell us? [Elektronische Daten] [Michael Peters] The degree of structural and functional specialization that differentiates between upper and lower limb use in humans is quite unparalleled among primates. It is argued that less neural resources are devoted to leg and foot control than to arm and hand control, and that this aspect of lower limb innervation, together with the uniquely restricted use of the lower limb, renders lower limb function more sensitive to general neural insult. In addition, the status of leg and foot control differs from that of arm and hand control both early in life and during the later years of decline. Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1990 foot and leg neuropsychology tests nationallicence Neuropsychology Review Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 1/2(1990-06-01), 165-183 1040-7308 1:2<165 1990 1 11065 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108716 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108716 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Peters Michael Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, NIG 2W1, Guelph, Ontario, Canada aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Neuropsychology Review Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 1/2(1990-06-01), 165-183 1040-7308 1:2<165 1990 1 11065 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer