<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465777821</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323111947.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19900701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00920059</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00920059</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Mark Reynolds, William Steward, Susan Sutherland]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">We evaluated factors that influence the catchtrial response in automated perimetry by consecutively examining 408 glaucoma patients (703 eyes) with either the program 30-2 or a 76-point screen with a quantified defect on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. The prevalence of positive catch trials using both programs was: 15.9% fixation losses, 5.5% false-positives, and 17.0% false-negatives. The only significant difference between the two programs was a lower prevalence of false-negatives on the program 30-2 (P &lt; 0.01). False-positive responses showed a significant positive correlation to fixation losses, and the catch trial response in general was correlated significantly to defect depth, test time, age, and visual acuity (P &lt; 0.05). This study suggests that the prevalence of positive catch trials is not an independent variable when testing glaucoma patients with automated perimetry and is not reduced by using a screening strategy over a full-threshold exam.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Reynolds</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mark</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Steward</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">William</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sutherland</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Susan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biometry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">228/4(1990-07-01), 338-341</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0721-832X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">228:4&lt;338</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">228</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">417</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920059</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00920059</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Reynolds</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Mark</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Steward</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">William</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sutherland</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Susan</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biometry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">228/4(1990-07-01), 338-341</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0721-832X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">228:4&lt;338</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">228</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">417</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
