<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465783368</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323112001.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19901101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02442610</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02442610</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Analysis of excitable cell activation: relative effects of external electrical stimuli</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[K. Altman, R. Plonsey]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In the functional electrical stimulation of nerve an expression defined as the ‘activating function' has been introduced to evaluate the propensity for a particular fibre to excite. This approach to determine resulting activation is only an approximation as it neglects the presence of the fibres on the applied field, in contrast to activity determined from a rigorous solution to the core conductor/excitable membrane equations. An alternative approach to determining relative excitability based on the induced transmembrane potential is presented, thereby allowing for current redistribution via the space constant of the target fibre. The paper critically examines the approximations made with activating functions, and concludes that as currently formulated the activating function has limitations in predicting relative excitability under a number of important conditions. In contrast, it is the induced (passive) transmembrane potential that provides a quantitatively reliable estimate of the tendency for fibres to excite.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">IFMBE, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Activating function</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Functional electrical stimulation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Nerve/muscle activation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Theoretical electrophysiology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Altman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 27706, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Plonsey</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 27706, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">28/6(1990-11-01), 574-580</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0140-0118</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">28:6&lt;574</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">28</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11517</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442610</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442610</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Altman</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 27706, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Plonsey</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 27706, Durham, NC, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">28/6(1990-11-01), 574-580</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0140-0118</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">28:6&lt;574</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">28</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11517</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
