<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465793975</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323112032.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19900601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01807623</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01807623</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Beaulieu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Liliane</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The University of California at Berkeley, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Proofs in expository writing — Some examples from Bourbaki's early drafts</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Liliane Beaulieu]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Conclusion: The stories told above exemplify the ordinary as much as they document the extraordinary. In the practice of expository writing, definitions play as important a role as mathematical proofs. Also, specifying notation and vocabulary is usually at stake in the writing of textbooks. Although the making of concepts and conceptual settings puts an emphasis on definitions, proofs are in no way absent from this process: in the case of Bourbaki's treatment of Stokes' Theorem, proofs may have acted as a spark in the search for better settings. In the case of filters, the discovery of new concepts simplified some proofs and enabled the results to hold in a more general context. But the motivation for new concepts to be defined did not rise exclusively from a dissatisfaction with proofs that were deemed not rigorous enough. Moreover, the close interplay between the members' own research and the group's expository task tended to relegate proofs to a heuristic in the background of the group's preoccupations.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Interchange</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">21/2(1990-06-01), 35-45</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0826-4805</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">21:2&lt;35</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">21</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10780</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807623</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807623</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Beaulieu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Liliane</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The University of California at Berkeley, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Interchange</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">21/2(1990-06-01), 35-45</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0826-4805</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">21:2&lt;35</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">21</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10780</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
