<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465794025</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323112032.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19900301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02482604</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02482604</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Flower</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Robert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The Applied Physics Laboratory and the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute of The Johns Hopkins University and Hospital, 20707, Laurel, MD, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Perinatal ocular physiology and ROP in the experimental animal model</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Robert Flower]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In order to overcome the scarcity of premature human ocular tissues and the enormous obstacles to direct examination of immature human ocular vasculatures, a number of animal models have been employed by investigators in order to study various aspects of ROP. A variety of factors may influence selection of the particular model used, but ultimately it is the faithfulness with which the model mimics human ROP that is most important. The validity of the models has been and remains a controversial subject, but evidence appears strong in favor of the beagle puppy model for studying physiology of the ocular vasculatures during perinatal development. Human ROP pathology usually is defined in terms of static morphological state, physiological dysfunction being considerably more difficult to assess. Most of the animal models fall short of mimicking the pathological lesions found in human eyes, especially those associated with severe, or end-stage ROP, yet they do fairly well in terms of mimicking the retinal vascular physiological changes associated with onset of the disease. Unfortunately, where the physiological aspects of ROP are concerned, focus is primarily on the effects of hyperoxia; other physiological factors as well as the potential role of the choroid are essentially ignored. This paper discusses the potential of physiological changes which occur during the perinatal period to play a role in ROP pathogenesis.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">retinopathy of prematurity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">beagle puppy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">perinatal physiology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">choroid</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Documenta Ophthalmologica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">74/3(1990-03-01), 153-162</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0012-4486</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">74:3&lt;153</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">74</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10633</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482604</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482604</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Flower</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Robert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">The Applied Physics Laboratory and the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute of The Johns Hopkins University and Hospital, 20707, Laurel, MD, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Documenta Ophthalmologica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">74/3(1990-03-01), 153-162</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0012-4486</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">74:3&lt;153</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">74</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10633</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
