<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465796257</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323112038.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19901201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02541869</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02541869</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Formation of sultones in olefin sulphonation</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[D. Roberts, D. Williams]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sultones are formed in the sulphonation of unbranched α and internal olefins in the sequence β→γ→δ. In the case of α-olefin sulphonation by sulphur trioxide in a short residence time (ca.60 s) reactor, the β→γ sultone reaction has already gone to completion when the reaction mixture emerges from the reactor. Kinetic data are presented for the γ→δ terminal sultone isomerization. In the case of internal olefin sulphonation, formation of γ and δ sultones has not proceeded to a significant extent when the reaction product emerges from the reactor. Kinetic data are presented for the β→γ internal sultone isomerization. Two internal γ-sultones—cis andtrans—are formed, but only one internal δ-sultone, thetrans isomer. The internal γ→ internal δ sultone isomerizations required forcing conditions (150°C, 3 hr incomplete reactions) or prolonged aging (20-25°C, 21 day; δ sultone still the minor sultone). Thecis internal γ sultone is more resistant to isomerization than is itstrans isomer. These reactivity differences are rationalized using arguments developed from that proposed by Bordwell, Osborne and Chapman in 1959 to interpret the effects of methyl substitution on rates of γ-sultone solvolysis.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">American Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS), 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Olefin sulphonation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">sultones</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Roberts</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Port Sunlight Laboratories, Unilever Research, Quarry Road East, L63 3JW, Bebington, Merseyside, U.K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Williams</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Port Sunlight Laboratories, Unilever Research, Quarry Road East, L63 3JW, Bebington, Merseyside, U.K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">67/12(1990-12-01), 1020-1027</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0003-021X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">67:12&lt;1020</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">67</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11746</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02541869</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02541869</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Roberts</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Port Sunlight Laboratories, Unilever Research, Quarry Road East, L63 3JW, Bebington, Merseyside, U.K</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Williams</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Port Sunlight Laboratories, Unilever Research, Quarry Road East, L63 3JW, Bebington, Merseyside, U.K</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">67/12(1990-12-01), 1020-1027</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0003-021X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">67:12&lt;1020</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">67</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11746</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
