<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465818390</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323112128.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19901101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF03029361</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF03029361</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bracher</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michael</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Australian Family Project Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, GPO Box 4, ACT 2601, Canberra</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Explaining first marriage trends in Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Michael Bracher]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">As in other industrialized countries, marriage rates have fallen sharply in Australia over the last two decades. Most descriptions of Australian marriage trends date the beginning of the recent decline to the mid-1970s and suggest that marriage rates fell first among teenagers, next among people in their early twenties and, only lastly, among those in their late twenties. Most explanations invoke normative change as the primary determinant of the decline. This paper presents new estimates of Australian first marriage trends since the 1920s and then focuses on the recent period. Analysis of first marriage statistics shows that nuptiality decline actually began amongst the oldest potential marriers in the late 1960s, and then percolated down to the younger ages. An attempt to explain recent trends through Becker's economic theory of marriage proves unsuccessful. Nevertheless, time-series regression analyses indicate that over the last twenty years first marriage rates in Australia have followed major movements in economic factors, in particular employment status, and that neither normative change nor the economic rationality postulated by the economic theory of marriage needs to be invoked as the primary determinant of changing nuptiality.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of the Australian Population Association</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">7/2(1990-11-01), 128-150</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1443-2447</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">7:2&lt;128</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">7</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">12546</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029361</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029361</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bracher</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Michael</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Australian Family Project Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, GPO Box 4, ACT 2601, Canberra</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of the Australian Population Association</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">7/2(1990-11-01), 128-150</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1443-2447</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">7:2&lt;128</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">7</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">12546</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
