<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">465820921</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323112135.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170327e19900301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01932130</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01932130</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, 32816, Orlando, FL, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Analysis of recursive batched interpolation search</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[S. Lang]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">For an ordered file of records with uniformly distributed key values, we examine an existing batched searching algorithm based on recursive use of interpolation searches. The algorithm, called Recursive Batched Interpolation Search (RBIS) in this paper, uses a divide-and-conquer technique for batched searching. The expected-case complexity of the algorithm is shown to beO(m loglog (2n/m) +m), wheren is the size of the file andm is the size of the query batch. Simulations are performed to demonstrate the savings of batched searching using RBIS. Also, simulations are performed to compare alternative batched searching algorithms which are based on either interpolation search or binary search. When the file's key values are uniformly distributed, the simulation results confirm that interpolation-search based algorithms are superior to binary-search based algorithms. However, when the file's key values are not uniformly distributed, a straight-forward batched interpolation search deteriorates quickly as the batch size increases, but algorithm RBIS still outperforms binary-search based algorithms when the batch size passes a threshold value.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BIT Foundations, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">D.4.3</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">F.2.2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Batched searching</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">binary search</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">interpolation search</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">analysis of algorithms</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">BIT Numerical Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">30/1(1990-03-01), 42-50</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0006-3835</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">30:1&lt;42</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">30</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10543</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01932130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01932130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Lang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, 32816, Orlando, FL, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">BIT Numerical Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">30/1(1990-03-01), 42-50</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0006-3835</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">30:1&lt;42</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">30</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10543</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
