<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467906327</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406152835.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e20061001xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10701-006-9070-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10701-006-9070-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Greenberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">O.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, 20742-4111, College Park, MD, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Why is $$\mathcal{CPT}$$ Fundamental?</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[O. Greenberg]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lüders and Pauli proved the $$\mathcal{CPT}$$ theorem based on Lagrangian quantum field theory almost half a century ago. Jost gave a more general proof based on &quot;axiomatic” field theory nearly as long ago. The axiomatic point of view has two advantages over the Lagrangian one. First, the axiomatic point of view makes clear why $$\mathcal{CPT}$$ is fundamental—because it is intimately related to Lorentz invariance. Secondly, the axiomatic proof gives a simple way to calculate the $$\mathcal{CPT}$$ transform of any relativistic field without calculating $$\mathcal{C}$$ , $$\mathcal{P}$$ and $$\mathcal{T}$$ separately and then multiplying them. The purpose of this pedagogical paper is to &quot;deaxiomatize” the $$\mathcal{CPT}$$ theorem by explaining it in a few simple steps. We use theorems of distribution theory and of several complex variables without proof to make the exposition elementary.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">CPT theorem</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">general quantum field theory</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Lorentz covariance</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Foundations of Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">36/10(2006-10-01), 1535-1553</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0015-9018</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">36:10&lt;1535</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">36</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10701</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9070-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9070-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Greenberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">O.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, 20742-4111, College Park, MD, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Foundations of Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">36/10(2006-10-01), 1535-1553</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0015-9018</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">36:10&lt;1535</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">36</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10701</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
