<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467909733</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406152846.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e20060301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00037-005-0203-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00037-005-0203-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Krause</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Matthias</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Lehrstuhl Theoretische Informatik, Universität Mannheim, 68131, Mannheim, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">On the computational power of Boolean decision lists</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Matthias Krause]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Abstract.: We study the computational power of decision lists over AND-functions versus $$ \hbox{threshold-}\oplus $$ circuits. AND-decision lists are a natural generalization of formulas in disjunctive or conjunctive normal form. We show that, in contrast to CNF- and DNF-formulas, there are functions with small AND-decision lists which need exponential size unbounded weight $$\hbox{threshold-}\oplus $$ circuits. Consequently, it is questionable if the polynomial learning algorithm for DNFs of Jackson (1994), which is based on the efficient simulation of DNFs by polynomial weight $$ \hbox{threshold-}\oplus $$ circuits (Krause &amp; Pudlák 1994), can be successfully applied to functions with small AND-decision lists. A further result is that for all k ≥ 1 the complexity class defined by polynomial length AC0k-decision lists lies strictly between AC0k+1 and AC0k+2.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2005</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Decision lists</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">AC 0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">learnability</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">lower bounds</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">68Q15</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">94C05</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">94C10</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">06E30</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">computational complexity</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Birkhäuser-Verlag; www.birkhauser.ch</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">14/4(2006-03-01), 362-375</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1016-3328</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">14:4&lt;362</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">14</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">37</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-005-0203-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00037-005-0203-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Krause</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Matthias</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Lehrstuhl Theoretische Informatik, Universität Mannheim, 68131, Mannheim, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">computational complexity</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Birkhäuser-Verlag; www.birkhauser.ch</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">14/4(2006-03-01), 362-375</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1016-3328</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">14:4&lt;362</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">14</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">37</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
