<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467915083</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406152859.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e20060601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11263-006-6486-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11263-006-6486-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">When are Simple LS Estimators Enough? An Empirical Study of LS, TLS, and GTLS</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Arvind Nayak, Emanuele Trucco, Neil Thacker]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A variety of least-squares estimators of significantly different complexity and generality are available to solve over-constrained linear systems. The most theoretically general may not necessarily be the best choice in practice; problem conditions may be such that simpler and faster algorithms, if theoretically inferior, would yield acceptable errors. We investigate when this may happen using homography estimation as the reference problem. We study the errors of LS, TLS, equilibrated TLS and GTLS algorithms with different noise types and varying intensity and correlation levels. To allow direct comparisons with algorithms from the applied mathematics and computer vision communities, we consider both inhomogeneous and homogeneous systems. We add noise to image co-ordinates and system matrix entries in separate experiments, to take into account the effect on noise properties (heteroscedasticity) of pre-processing data transformations. We find that the theoretically most general algorithms may not always be worth their higher complexity; comparable results are obtained with moderate levels of noise intensity and correlation. We identify such levels quantitatively for the reference problem, thus suggesting when simpler algorithms can be applied with limited errors in spite of their restrictive assumptions.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">least squares</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">total least squares</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">generalized total least squares</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">2-D homography</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">correlated noise</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Nayak</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Arvind</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Vision, Image and Signal Processing Group, EECE-EPS, Heriot Watt University, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Trucco</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emanuele</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Vision, Image and Signal Processing Group, EECE-EPS, Heriot Watt University, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thacker</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Neil</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Imaging Science &amp; Biomedical Engineering, Medical School, University of Manchester, M13 9PT, Manchester, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Computer Vision</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">68/2(2006-06-01), 203-216</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0920-5691</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">68:2&lt;203</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">68</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11263</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-6486-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">brief-communication</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-006-6486-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Nayak</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Arvind</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Vision, Image and Signal Processing Group, EECE-EPS, Heriot Watt University, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Trucco</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emanuele</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Vision, Image and Signal Processing Group, EECE-EPS, Heriot Watt University, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Thacker</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Neil</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Imaging Science &amp; Biomedical Engineering, Medical School, University of Manchester, M13 9PT, Manchester, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Computer Vision</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">68/2(2006-06-01), 203-216</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0920-5691</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">68:2&lt;203</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">68</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11263</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
