<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467920931</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406152916.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e20061101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10978-006-9000-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10978-006-9000-4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Newton</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Scott</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Law, School of Oriental and African Studies, Thornhaugh Street, WC1H 0XG, Russell Square, London, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Constitutionalism and imperialism Sub Specie Spinozae</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Scott Newton]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Contemporary interpretations of Spinozan political theory and metaphysics (Negri, Balibar, Deleuze) suggest a parallel critique of constitutionalism and imperialism. Spinoza's suspicion (in the Ethics) of every attempt to divide constituting power (potentia) from constituted power (potestas), and his simultaneous concern with the structure of constitutional frameworks (in the Political Treatise) and with their symbolic or passional significance (in the Theologico-Political Treatise) reveal the double-edged property of constitutionalism: its capacity both to constrain and to facilitate the dynamics of potentia, of the power of bodies. Imperialism operates in a similar fashion, on larger scales. European colonial empires were constituted as complexes of juridical-institutional forms, aggregating colonial subjects as new multitudes. They created new, hybrid worlds (however repressive and limited) with the bricks and mortar of institutions and conditioned the emergence of new political subjectivities, both releasing and channelling the flow of potentia. From a Spinozan perspective, the operations of constitutionalism and imperialism can be seen as analogous, and uncritical celebration of the one and condemnation of the other both become problematic.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">constitutionalism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">imperialism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">potentia (pouvoir constituant)</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">potestas (pouvoir constitué)</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Spinoza</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Law and Critique</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">17/3(2006-11-01), 325-355</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0957-8536</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">17:3&lt;325</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">17</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10978</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-006-9000-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-006-9000-4</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Newton</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Scott</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Law, School of Oriental and African Studies, Thornhaugh Street, WC1H 0XG, Russell Square, London, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Law and Critique</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">17/3(2006-11-01), 325-355</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0957-8536</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">17:3&lt;325</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">17</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10978</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
