caa a22 4500 467920966 CHVBK 20180406152917.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e20061101xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s10978-006-9002-2 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10978-006-9002-2 Kochi Tarik Socio-Legal Research Centre, Griffith Law School, Griffith University, 4111, Brisbane, Qld, Australia aut The Partisan: Carl Schmitt and Terrorism [Elektronische Daten] [Tarik Kochi] The words terror and terrorism are used widely today and are used to denote an illegitimate act of violence. War, on the other hand is used as a more open concept, the legitimacy of every particular act is at least placed under limited debate. The issue of how our thoughts upon the legitimacy of violence are ordered by the framing of the legal concepts of terror and war is an important contemporary question. One way into this question is by giving an account of Carl Schmitt's theory of ‘partisan war.' Introducing Schmitt's concept of the ‘partisan' into Anglophone legal theory is the main aim of this paper. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2006 Carl Schmitt nationallicence Hegel nationallicence international law nationallicence Iraq nationallicence partisan nationallicence recognition nationallicence terror nationallicence terrorism nationallicence war nationallicence Law and Critique Kluwer Academic Publishers 17/3(2006-11-01), 267-295 0957-8536 17:3<267 2006 17 10978 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-006-9002-2 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-006-9002-2 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Kochi Tarik Socio-Legal Research Centre, Griffith Law School, Griffith University, 4111, Brisbane, Qld, Australia aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Law and Critique Kluwer Academic Publishers 17/3(2006-11-01), 267-295 0957-8536 17:3<267 2006 17 10978 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer