<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467921679</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406152918.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e20060401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10836-006-7427-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10836-006-7427-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Impact of Body Bias on Delay Fault Testing of Sub-100nm CMOS Circuits</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Bipul Paul, Kaushik Roy]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A Body biasing technique has recently been proposed for microprocessors in sub-100nm technology generations [11, 12]. It is shown that forward body bias (FBB) reduces the leakage power and suppresses the effect of process variation while reducing the complexity of dualVth technology. In this paper, we study the effect of body bias on the delay fault testing of CMOS circuits. We analyze the impact of both fixed and adaptive body biasing techniques on test cost and the quality of test. Statistical analysis on several benchmark circuits shows that the adaptive body biasing design will have the most effective impact on delay fault by maintaining the test cost at its minimum under process variation while ensuring the test quality at its highest level.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">delay fault testing</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">adaptive body bias design</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">process variation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">statistical analysis</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Paul</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Bipul</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Toshiba America Research Inc., 2590 Orchard Parkway, 95131, San Jose, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Roy</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kaushik</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, 47907-1285, West Lafayette, IN, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Electronic Testing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">22/2(2006-04-01), 115-124</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0923-8174</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">22:2&lt;115</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">22</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10836</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-006-7427-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-006-7427-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Paul</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Bipul</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Toshiba America Research Inc., 2590 Orchard Parkway, 95131, San Jose, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Roy</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kaushik</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, 47907-1285, West Lafayette, IN, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Electronic Testing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">22/2(2006-04-01), 115-124</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0923-8174</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">22:2&lt;115</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">22</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10836</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
