<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467937737</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406153002.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e20060401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s00703-005-0140-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s00703-005-0140-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Vaidya</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S. S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The performance of two convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model over the Indian region</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[S. S. Vaidya]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Summary: A comparative study has been carried out using two cumulus parameterization schemes, namely the Kain-Fritsch and Betts-Miller-Janjic schemes within the Atmospheric Regional Prediction System model. The performances of these two schemes are examined for four weather disturbances over the Indian region. The results are evaluated using predicted parameters such as mean sea level pressure, wind, temperature/moisture fields and rainfall. Rainfall and other predicted parameters are discussed on the basis of known synoptic features associated with the disturbances. Rainfall prediction is subjectively assessed based on the amount and spatial distribution. Results indicate that out of the four cases examined, in three, the Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme produced better results whilst in the fourth, the Kain-Fritsch scheme performed better. The Betts-Miller-Janjic convection scheme produced smoother and more convective rainfall rates in all cases.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">92/3-4(2006-04-01), 175-190</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0177-7971</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">92:3-4&lt;175</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">92</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">703</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0140-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0140-0</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Vaidya</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S. S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, India</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">92/3-4(2006-04-01), 175-190</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0177-7971</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">92:3-4&lt;175</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">92</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">703</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
