<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467938768</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406153005.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e20061201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s10822-006-9070-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s10822-006-9070-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A marriage made in torsional space: using GALAHAD models to drive pharmacophore multiplet searches</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Jennifer Shepphird, Robert Clark]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Pharmacophore multiplets are useful tools for 3D database searching, with the queries used ordinarily being derived from ensembles of random conformations of active ligands. It seems reasonable to expect that their usefulness can be augmented by instead using queries derived from single ligand conformations obtained from aligned ligands. Comparisons of pharmacophore multiplet searching using random conformations with multiplet searching using single conformations derived from GALAHAD (a genetic algorithm with linear assignment for hypermolecular alignment of datasets) models do indeed show that, while query hypotheses based on random conformations are quite effective, hypotheses based on aligned conformations do a better job of discriminating between active and inactive compounds. In particular, the hypothesis created from a neuraminidase inhibitor model was more similar to half of 18 known actives than all but 0.2% of the compounds in a structurally diverse subset of the World Drug Index. Similarly, a model developed from five angiotensin II antagonists yielded hypotheses that placed 65 known antagonists within the top 0.1-1% of decoy databases. The differences in discriminating power ranged from 2 to 20-fold, depending on the protein target and the type of pharmacophore multiplet used.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GALAHAD</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Molecular alignment</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Pharmacophore</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Pharmacophore multiplets</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Tuplets</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Virtual screening</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">ATII : Angiotensin II</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">CHDPA : Chapman and Hall Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Agents</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GA : Genetic algorithm</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">GALAHAD : Genetic automated molecular overlays</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">ROC : Receiver Operating Characteristic</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">WDI : World Drug Index</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Shepphird</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jennifer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Informatics Research Center, Tripos Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, 63144, St. Louis, MO, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Clark</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Robert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Informatics Research Center, Tripos Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, 63144, St. Louis, MO, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/12(2006-12-01), 763-771</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0920-654X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:12&lt;763</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10822</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9070-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9070-2</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Shepphird</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jennifer</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Informatics Research Center, Tripos Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, 63144, St. Louis, MO, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Clark</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Robert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Informatics Research Center, Tripos Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, 63144, St. Louis, MO, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">20/12(2006-12-01), 763-771</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0920-654X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">20:12&lt;763</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">20</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10822</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
